Hello! On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 02:56:34PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > What would be the benefit? Mach sources already don't have any complete > paperwork trail for their authorship and ownership. No GNU person working > on Mach has ever particularly wanted to claim new control over the sources, > or to further constrain their license terms.
Okay, I know and that's fair, but shouldn't we nevertheless then state that somehow in the files? How are the copyright conditions of changes that GNU people installed? They sure aren't ``Copyright (c) 1994-1988 Carnegie Mellon University. Copyright (c) 1993,1994 The University of Utah and the Computer Systems Laboratory (CSL). All rights reserved.'' Regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
