Barry deFreese, le Thu 14 Dec 2006 21:57:49 -0500, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault wrote: > >Barry deFreese, le Thu 14 Dec 2006 02:03:10 +0000, a écrit : > > > >>That is just from running times on a little C program that counts to > >>1000000000, so it's obviously not scientific. > >> > > > >Try compiling something, gnumach for instance ;) > > > Not much of a diff there either: > > gnumach build: > > No cache: 12:50 > Cache: 12:25
What processor is this? Samuel _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
