Hi all. Guys I _was_ really interested about Hurd development and all those new things (Microkernel, multi-servers, OO, ..). So I downloaded code, willing to study it to be able to contribute. Till now no problems !. But really guys Please stick on a consistent path.
In the doc/navigating file, it says I should have good understanding of the Mach microkernel. Then I see some guys say L4 is much better and quicker than Mach. So Hurd will be ported to L4. THEN, I hear that HURD main maintaners wants to make HURD be built over Coyotos !. Guys for God's sake, you are pushing all the developers out instead of attracting them. I wanted to contribute. But I don't Like the idea that my code and work will be nothin if normally the maintainers just chose another microkernel cause of a missing feature in the current one. Please try to attract developers. If Coyotos is the right path, stick with it. I hope I can help you guys when you really have a clear direction path. -- Ahmed Darwish _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
