On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:53:12AM -0200, Matheus Morais wrote: > I'm a bit confuse about how mach revival project will work in some aspects.
Me too, so let's try to get this sorted out right now. <URL:http://hurd.gnufans.org/bin/view/Mach/GNUMachRevivalProject> gives a rough overview about what that effort is supposed to be. I don't know anything about the current state. > I'm on the task to clean up gnumach code and I already made some progress > removing warnings from compile proccess, as gianluca said, but I have no > idea where I must post/show/give/upload these modifyed files. Here, on this very mailing list. Imho there is no need for yet another mailing list which Gianluca thought about creating. > Maybe I must > create a patch for them? Posting patches would be a convenient way for us to review the fixes and finally apply them to the RCS, given there is a consensus among the participients of this mailing list. Note that for fixes that are more advanced than adding some casts to get rid of compile-time warnings or similar, we'd like you to assign the copyright of your changes to the FSF. > After project done a new branch for gnumach will be created? I don't see the immediate need for that, be it before or after ``the project is done''; under the assumption that GNU Mach remains to be GNU Mach w.r.t. interfaces to the Hurd, etc. Regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
