Looks ok. Why the ifdef i386 though?
2006-01-02 Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* iopb.c (i386_io_port_add): Get the device parameter properly.
(i386_io_port_remove): Likewise.
diff -urp gnumach-mine-2-default_noio/i386/i386/iopb.c
gnumach-mine-3-device_port_fix/i386/i386/iopb.c
--- gnumach-mine-2-default_noio/i386/i386/iopb.c 2006-01-02
18:38:31.000000000 +0100
+++ gnumach-mine-3-device_port_fix/i386/i386/iopb.c 2006-01-02
18:42:45.000000000 +0100
@@ -308,12 +308,22 @@
/*
* Add an IO mapping to a thread.
*/
+#ifdef i386
+kern_return_t
+i386_io_port_add(
+ thread_t thread,
+ device_t d)
+#else
kern_return_t
i386_io_port_add(
thread_t thread,
mach_device_t device)
+#endif
{
pcb_t pcb;
+#ifdef i386
+ mach_device_t device = d->emul_data;
+#endif
iopb_tss_t io_tss, new_io_tss;
io_port_t io_port;
io_use_t iu, old_iu;
@@ -407,12 +417,22 @@
/*
* Remove an IO mapping from a thread.
*/
+#ifdef i386
+kern_return_t
+i386_io_port_remove(thread, d)
+ thread_t thread;
+ device_t d;
+#else
kern_return_t
i386_io_port_remove(thread, device)
thread_t thread;
mach_device_t device;
+#endif
{
pcb_t pcb;
+#ifdef i386
+ mach_device_t device = d->emul_data;
+#endif
iopb_tss_t io_tss;
io_port_t io_port;
io_use_t iu;
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
