El dom, 13-11-2005 a las 21:14 +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt escribió: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/hurd-devel/2002-05/msg00060.html > > Here, Roland clearly states that gnumach-1-branch is only for > bugfixes. > > That was 3 years ago, when OSKit was all the rage. gnumach-1-branch > is far far simpler to maintain, as has been shown by the continues > efforts to keep it working as it should including bug fixes, new > drivers, and what not. I don't even think that HEAD actually works at > all right now, and I really don't care. The benefits of having > everything in one tree outweigh the benefits of spliting it up just > cause there are more drivers in OSKit that nobody actually uses. Most > NIC's are now supported by GNU Mach 1.x + my NIC patch. This and the > SCSI drivers are really the only drivers that we even remotley > support. The change to OSKit doesn't add anything, other than a > headache. > > So there is no reason not to revert the `bug fixes only' rule for > gnumach-1-branch, if there is a tier one who checks patches. >
That was a maintainer decission, so until Roland (or another maintainer) says something against it, I must assume that this rule stills in force. Thanks! -- Sergio Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
