> I'm not willing to invest my spare time in something that might > never be used again (Hurd/Mach?), nor am I willing to invest my > spare time in something that will never see day light (Hurd/L4?). > And that nobody is telling me, a person who has been around for a > while, what the heck one should invest their time in is the major > problem.
I cannot guess the future. I'm sorry, but I can't. Actually, I wasn't trying to get a glimps of the future. I consider it very different if the changes are incremental vs total redesign. Innfact, it would be cool if Mach got so rewamped in the future that it would look like L4 or whatever else. It is the two codebases at once thingy that is the grief of me and others. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
