"Neal H. Walfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not suggesting that we should fix Unix's chroot with our chroot. > However, there are a fair number of programs (namely daemons) which > understand the security holes and are able, nevertheless, to take > advantages of Unix's chroot behavior. The fact that our chroot is > less secure than Unix's deserves, I think, at least a caveat.
Yes, that's a documentation bug. :) It is possible that we should have a facility for those daemons to use, but regardless we should make clear that the Hurd's chroot is not a security feature. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
