Ben Asselstine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Let's take the simple example of a symlink translator noticing that > the file it points to has gone away. > > A user would register for interaction with the symlink translator, to > give it permission to bug you when it wanted to. Is this act of > registering itself interactive? Which translators do we care about at > any given time?
No, not at all. You would specify your context in every RPC. It's up to the translator to decide what to do with it. There is no "registration". You could even have a "level of importance" tag and a way for you to specify (in your context) what kinds of things you want handled automatically and what prompted; then the server could DTRT every time. Thomas _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
