On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 04:38:04PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:02:58PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Shall I prepare equivalent lists for the other packages? > > There will be an upload of the hurd package in due short which will > shuffle around the patches quite a bit (dropping the ones which got > applied, introducing new ones), so at least for this package, there is > not much use currently.
Do you sync _to_ upstream then? Already applied: netfs_io_select.patch netfs_nonblock.patch Apply cleanly (at least independently of each other): patches-contrib/kbd.patch ext2fs_large_stores.patch mouse.patch no-debian-dir.patch pfinet_dhcp.patch rc.patch startup-usr-support.patch ttys.patch Do not apply cleanly: console_repeater.patch exec.patch libcons_repeater.patch Regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
