Sure, if you start with the idea that guile should be at the core of the console, then this would be how to do it. But it isn't, and probably never will be.
And you have not provided any reasons why it shouldn't. Guile should be at the core of the GNU system (and the console is a important part of the GNU system), and you are flat out rejecting this idea without providing any reasons what so ever as to why. It is indeed quite clear that the Hurd console should use guile so that it can be modifed by the user without having to recompile it, that you are unwilling to even bother to see or even comment on why it shouldn't is just a sad. So, if you disagree at that fundamental level, then I am afraid you have to start from scratch. In this case, please refrain from making attacks on the current code base, or on the suggestions on how to improve it along the way it was designed. Why don't you stop making baseless accusations? Nobody was making any attacks at the current code base. There is no reason to start from scratch, even if you insist on some kind of disagreement that doesn't exist. If your only complaint is "that isn't how it is designed", then one can't ever improve the design, and not using guile from the start was a huge mistake. Thankfully, it doesn't require extensive rewrites of the code. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
