On 20050111T174249+0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > I would expect GCC to eventually fix its inline handling to conform with > C99 > > The problem isn't C99, but C90, __inline is handled differently than > inline by gcc. The former works even with -ansi enabled.
I was under the impression that __inline is an alias for inline, with no semantic differences. If I'm correct, then extern __inline will change semantics when extern inline does. -- Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.info/ Blogi - http://kaijanaho.info/antti-juhani/blog/ Toys - http://www.cc.jyu.fi/yhd/toys/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
