This is an arbitrary change and as thus I should reject it.

It wasn't meant as a incentive to go about and fixing all kinds of
silly things.  Only reason I submitted the patch in the first place
was because I really did get confused by "consnode_path" when reading
the console code; which is why I don't consider it arbitrary.

   But as you obviously feel strongly about it, I concur, for this
   time (and because I don't fancy consnode_patch either).

Thanks, I'll commit it in a few days or so.



_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Reply via email to