> Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It is a nice feature that st_size is useful on disks in the Hurd, even > > though it's useless on Unix. For st_blocks, it makes less sense per se > > because it's not using space on the containing filesystem. Arguably it > > should just leave it alone so it's whatever is actually being consumed on > > the underlying filesystem, which will normally be zero. > > Does this mean I can commit the patch? > > If not, what do you suggest to do?
Have you tried what I suggested above? i.e., don't modify st_blocks from what trivfs starts with. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
