Would anyone object to not installing runsystem and rc when doing
`make install'?
If you are making a system you should tweak both of them anyway, and
in a sub-hurd it doesn't matter, since you'll be punted into a
single-luser shell (or you should) by init. I personally consider rc
and runsystem as configuration files, and overwriting config files is
just a no-no in my book (and I can't really count how many times I got
seriously pissed because it munged my tweaked versions).
Please? This is like the third time I'm annoying everyone with
rc/runsystem. :-)
daemons/ChangeLog
2004-12-16 Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Makefile (targets): Removed `rc' and `runsystem'.
Index: daemons/Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/hurd/hurd/daemons/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.11 Makefile
--- daemons/Makefile 18 Jun 1999 22:04:43 -0000 1.11
+++ daemons/Makefile 16 Dec 2004 20:20:29 -0000
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Makefile for daemons
#
-# Copyright (C) 1996,99 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# Copyright (C) 1996,99,04 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
dir := daemons
makemode := utilities
-targets = rc getty mail.local console-run runttys runsystem
+targets = getty mail.local console-run runttys
special-targets = rc runsystem
SRCS = rc.sh getty.c lmail.c console-run.c runttys.c
installationdir = $(libexecdir)
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
