At Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:19:22 +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > > > I agree with Neal. I can test it before I commit it as Neal > > requested. > > > > Roland, OK to commit? > > That looks fine to me. > > Guillem didn't tell me that this will cause a bunch of asserts to > happen if Neal's patches (no idea which) aren't applied _first_. > > Infact, the welcome message for me when I booted the kernel was a > assert in linux/dev/glue/kmem.c line 470 right after partition checks. > > Should I still commit it even if it breaks peoples kernels for now? > > And could someone be kind enough to post whatever "Neal's patches" are > so that they can be check and blessed?
Sounds like it might be this [1] patch. patch #3347 overview: Double free and memory loss probing partition table "While GNU Mach reads the partition table, the second assert in linux/dev/glue:free_pages is triggered. This particular assert checks for double frees." [1] https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=3347 _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
