> There is a reason the default pager avoids using the vanilla > malloc. > > What would you think about a patch that changes all references to > malloc()/free() to kalloc()/kfree() in the default pager and then > remove the stubs for malloc()/free() in kalloc.c?
Ascertain that this is the only use of allocation in the program, and sure. If it's calling libc routines that do allocation, this is not ok. > Figure out why the libc malloc is being linked in. > > We compile mach-defpager with -static; so we link against libc which > defines malloc/free. You don't seem to understand how static linking works. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
