> So why not off_t in the structure instead? > > Well, either we use off_t or we use loff_t (or even off64_t). Is > there any rule as to what should be used? Because I don't have a > real opinion about it (other then maybe that loff_t is clearer > then off_t)
Well, we should pick one. I don't remember how wide we are using for the io.defs protocol, which really should specify. Are they all the same? >From what I can see yes. We set _FILE_OFFSET to 64 at all times, off_t is then defined to off64_t, loff_t is always defined as off64_t. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
