> > It can be better than one Wiki, but I think that we need a on-line version that the > people can read the newest modifications. Because If only a group, or one person, > works in this job the manual could turn boring and discourage people to send fixes. > I think that we need most people possible > thats what CVS usually is for. When its software, its all the experimental updates being worked on, some good, some currently broken, so the same applies to software for the human mind as well. Using a wiki when you already have CVS to do that is redundant, and pointless when as said before, a wiki is less secure to people meddling and putting false information in. You can track who made what changes with CVS with very fine detail.
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
