This mail is an automated notification from the patch tracker
of the project: The GNU Hurd.
/**************************************************************************/
[patch #2507] Latest Modifications:
Changes by:
Daniel Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
'Date:
Thu 04/08/04 at 19:28 (Europe/Zurich)
------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
Besides the patch from Marco, I had to do following to get gnumach cleanly configured.
--- linux/configure.in.~1.2.~ Sat May 22 01:22:33 1999
+++ linux/configure.in Thu Apr 8 19:14:13 2004
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ dnl USE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
AC_INIT(src/include/linux/version.h)
AC_PREREQ(2.12)
-sinclude([../aclocal.m4])
+#sinclude([../aclocal.m4])
hurd_SYSTYPE
/**************************************************************************/
[patch #2507] Full Item Snapshot:
URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=2507>
Project: The GNU Hurd
Submitted by: Marco Gerards
On: Tue 01/20/04 at 19:45
Category: GNU Mach
Priority: 5 - Normal
Resolution: None
Assigned to: marcus
Originator Email:
Status: Open
Summary: Patch to update autoconf files
Original Submission:
Follow-up Comments
------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu 04/08/04 at 19:28 By: wagi
Besides the patch from Marco, I had to do following to get gnumach cleanly configured.
--- linux/configure.in.~1.2.~ Sat May 22 01:22:33 1999
+++ linux/configure.in Thu Apr 8 19:14:13 2004
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ dnl USE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
AC_INIT(src/include/linux/version.h)
AC_PREREQ(2.12)
-sinclude([../aclocal.m4])
+#sinclude([../aclocal.m4])
hurd_SYSTYPE
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun 02/29/04 at 13:47 By: marco_g
I did make the changes Alfred proposed in his mail:
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2004-02/msg00237.html
Jeff had some comments on my previous patch:
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2004-01/msg00090.html
I did not change this because I do not have enough knowledge
about autoconf. Is the patch ok like it is now or should the
patch be changed like Jeff said? I need a bit more help in
that case.
The NEWS entry was removed and so was the keyboard patch
because it is already in CVS.
File Attachments
-------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun 02/29/04 at 13:47 Name: acupdate2.diffcl Size: 7KB By: marco_g
http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/download.php?item_id=2507&item_file_id=2821
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue 01/20/04 at 19:45 Name: acupdate.diff Size: 8KB By: marco_g
http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/download.php?item_id=2507&item_file_id=2559
For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=2507>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
