On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:24:58PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > > I was thinking more along the lines so that the user will know > > that he/she is using a old version of libc. Because otherwise we > > would have to add each feature we depend on into our > > configure.in. > > Or just write it off. > > If you mean that it is not worth it, then maybe. But then we will > have users complaining about the Hurd not compiling, etc. And I think > it would be more useful to get rid of those questions with a simple > check in configure.in.
Why not just mentioning the required version/date of glibc in INSTALL? It already says: |The Hurd version 0.2 has been verified to work with versions 2.0.3 and |2.0.4 of the GNU C library. (But note that version 2.0.3 has some |easily-fixed bugs in compilation for the i386-gnu target.) Michael _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
