On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 09:56:41PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > "Standard" is a bit far stretched. We are talking about a solution that is > shared by BSD and Linux, I think, which are both monolithic Unix like > kernels, and thus have a different understanding about how things should > work. > > Of course it could be the same protocol, but it would be silly. You > would insert a man in the middle which has really nothing to do with this > whatsoever.
ah.. ok. I think too monolithic ;) > If I had one you would find it in the savannah task item about it. > > > > This bug is a will-not-fix or a non-bug. See also the savannah task > > > database, I am sure I have one open for that. I can't see an item in Console's task sublist: http://savannah.gnu.org/pm/task.php?group_project_id=483&group_id=30&func=browse > That's what I keep saying :) > > It needs to be cooperative, but it can be simple. It also can assume trust > between the communication partners (ie proper behaviour). I don't see the whole picture. how are the console client and X server accessing the keyboard and screen resources Mach provides? if someone is to coordinate their resource use, seems cleaner if it's the same folk who provides the resources. -- Robert Millan make: *** No rule to make target `war'. Stop. Another world is possible - Just say no to genocide _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
