On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:14:45AM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote: > Joachim Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > When I flood ping GNUmach2 I get 1% loss and no package loss with > > GNUmach1. Maybe we can spur some interest in tuning these numbers > > a bit? > Hmm, I don't know if this very important. The TCP/IP protocol handles > very well any packet loss :) I rather work on missing features than > spend much time in optimizing such things. Maybe my patch is > completely wrong. We have to wait what Roland or Thomas say to this.
In comparison to what else is missing in the Hurd right now it is surely a bit unimportant. And I don't mean to belittle your work in any way! I don't think your patch is wrong - it looks quite good actually. It might just be something small like calling the SOFTINTs more/less often. When we have it on the table someone else might come up with the optimization. Regards /Joachim -- Joachim Nilsson :: <joachim AT vmlinux DOT org> +46-(0)21-123348 :: <http://joachim.vmlinux.org> _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
