Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Why is that? If it's programs that call setuid(getuid()) that have > > this responsibility (as the original poster suggested), then this is > > just fine. On the other hand, my vote is that it's the setuid program > > itself that always has the responsibility. > > That is a new responsibility that individual programs never had before, so > programs not written with the Hurd in mind will not do it explicitly. For > the various variables that affect libc, the dynamic linker removes them > from the environment. So we could have it remove EXECSERVERS too.
Well, I think that the exec server should remove EXECSERVERS, on the ground that it's the exec server that knows about the feature too. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
