> What was the reason for disabling EXECSERVERS in exec? I think that > it is quite an useful feature when debugging exec, or playing around > with new features for it.
This[1] thread might interest you. [1] http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-hurd/2000-May/001211.html Interesting. Roland and/or Thomas, could you comment on the possible security risks, if any such existed with EXECSERVERS? _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
