> > I'm not sure what you mean with `ripping up the libc library once > again'. >
Quoting Neal below: > meet its requirements. In the Hurd, the primary users of ports are > libports and glibc. Sorry for the confusion. > <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/l4-hurd/2002-October/000692.html> Thanks so much. I think I need to start re-lurking on the l4-hurd list. :) > > > It tickles to me read things like, "netbsd, the most portable OS in > > the world", and stuff like that. > > Anything wrong with that? > Oh, well: start_possible_flame() GNU/Hurd ultimately needs to be 'THE OS'. We can't compromise on that, can we ?? end_possible_flame(). Cheers, George. -- ________________________________________________________________________________ Quote for the Week: - "If the ax is dull and its edge unsharpened, more strength is needed but skill will bring success." (Ecclesiastes 10:10 NIV) Cherry George Mathew, /~\ The ASCII II/157, Thyparampil Veedu, \ / Ribbon Campaign Eraviperoor P.O X Against Kerala, / \ HTML e-mail India 689542, Tel:+91-473-663982 http://resumes.yahoo.com/berryplumis/myprofile/ _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
