-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Assuming this is more appropriate for bug-hurd, so I'm cc'ing that
list.
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:31:23AM -0500, David Walter wrote:
>> I have this problem with the default mount binary. I found if you
>> build it w/o optimization it doesn't hang, or if you are mounting :-)
More explicitly typing mount hangs as in:
$ mount
.......wait forever......
but mount a file system doesn't.
$ mount /mnt
if fstab has an entry works
$ mount /dev/hd0s11 /home
works. (as long as you have permission)
> It's useful if you debug such bugs and sent in patches, or if you don't want
> to bother about that right at that time, just file a bug report on savannah.
On IRC someone (when I first found this problem) had dismissed this as
a 'feature' of my build, I accepted this, but continue to build w/o
optimization.
But in looking gcc3.* already had bugs posted against it for
optimization problems under some circumstances.
AFAIK this hasn't changed with gcc.
I would have posted a bug against gcc or the Hurd or both if
appropriate and considered posting one, but for the dismissal.
Is the appropriate course to post a bug against, the Hurd for using
- -O3, gcc for the problem and the mount command itself? Where should
these be posted, bug-hurd?
Does gcc need another bug report for this particular program failure?
- --
pub 1024D/DC92AE30 2002-02-26 David Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fingerprint = 50A0 E513 732D 1D0F BD26 C84E A8DD 9D80 DC92 AE30
sub 2048g/51023582 2002-02-26
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Hurd)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
iD8DBQE94i3MqN2dgNySrjARAg6kAKCfODMQ/R6Lf8Vv5kH4Vz/exampRQCfRdwS
Ze5YrrjZs7CsvGoMezhe2Xc=
=SK6K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
