> What about non-Mach backends? I would feel better about an > internal-interface-guarantee argument rather than an implementation > argument.
This requirement is part of the interface; I was using Mach for illustration purposes because I assume that Vincente is familiar with Mach concepts. On, for instance, L4, the sender would do a send and block until the receiver is ready. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
