On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:43:28PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Confirmed. What is the non-bus-walk name of these devices (just curious)? > > What do you mean? Devices don't have flat names. The names like "eth0" > and so forth are compatibility hacks in bus_walk_from_compat_string.
I thought the bus walk was to find a leaf in a hierarchy of devices, where the bus is a top node of the devices on the bus. Ie, like "i8042:kbd" etc. But that might be pure fiction, I never really groked the way devices are organized in oskit. > > Ah, which reminds me that I still use device_read and not > > device_read_inband, in my kbd driver. > > Well that's just silly. But they should both work. Yeah, I just c&p'ed that line from some other place. > > Writing of the bytes doesn't seem to work properly, I set up streamio > > (cat'ing from that works fine), and then I tried > > > > echo $'\xED\x07' > kbd > > The examples/x86/i8042 test program does just that, and it works (lights go > on). So this must be a problem interacting with oskit-mach. Ok, I will go into the debugging. Thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/ _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
