[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > > > Right, but that's already a Hurd-specific extension. So it's fine to > > expect it to use another Hurd-specific extension to get a reliable PID > > or other identification. > > What would such an extension look like?
It would have the same flavor as the way we handle control terminals--we would create a special port to authenticate the signals and so forth. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
