Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The bugs that happen are *not* merely that you lose occasional object > > files. You can get arbitrary corruption. > > And then fsck can repair that in the case of a crash, right?
No. The normal rules--the ones that I describe as "bug free" keep things such that fsck can repair them. Breaking those rules--thus, what I mean by a "bug"--produces possible forms of corruption that cannot be automatically fixed by fsck. > It would be a lot nicer if glibc would compile a lot faster and have > some filesystem corruption *if* there would be a crash. However, there > should be no crash in the first place. Apparently your local power company is better than the ones we have in the US... Thomas _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
