> sorry still the same problem, whatever i do, i can't find a clean way to > name the parted module libstore_part.so.0.2 with automake
Allow me to add a detail or two. Using libstore, it appears that we can only create libraries with the names of the form `libstore_part-0.2.so'. The code in libstore/module.c, however, is looking for file names of the genre `libstore_part.so.0.2'. Or, to put it simply, libtool uses one naming scheme and the Hurd uses another. What we are looking for, essentially, is to either make the Hurd conform to the libtools' naming scheme or vica verse. Looking at /lib on my system does not make it clear to me that one is preferred over the other; both seem to be used pervasively throughout. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
