* Jeff Bailey writes: > I don't know of any good way to make configure.in compatible with > both 2.13 and 2.52. If Roland wants, I can convert it up to 2.52, > though.
Is there a need to make the configure.in script compatible with 2.13 and 2.5x anyway? When you release something you always supply the generated configure script, and the only affected party is the people that actually hack on the Hurd. Roland, do you have any opinions about such a change? > It opens a bigger quesiton in my head of if we should consider > automake, so as to provide a nice example for folks who want to > write translators. I have a checkout somewhere that I converted the > Hurd to using ac2.5 and automake. It wasn't too hard. Could you post these changes? -- Alfred M. Szmidt _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
