On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 07:52:08AM -0800, James Morrison wrote: > I'm curious what types of checks would be in a make check target > for the hurd. Would have to be run in a sub-hurd to test all the > hurd translators and libc functions? Should the test programs be > compiled within that test sub-hurd?
You could probably do most of the testing without running in a subhurd. It seems to me that make check spawning a subhurd might introduce too many unknowns. I'm supposed to look into cunit for Mailutils. But the idea behind cppunit and junit, is that you inherit the object and apply a testing framework to that. That way you can test interfaces and such at the unit level. We're just getting into it - subscribe to bug-mailutils if you want to watch (or help) with out successes and failures. -- Some people play the lottery, some people use Ebay. Personally, I've had much better luck with Ebay than the lottery - hendridm _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
