Roland: > I checked in the fix for that stupid libc bug (d'oh!). No problem. Just glad I could help in some small way.
> As to gdb, did you test the gdb "gcore" command? Your patch didn't include > any changes to the gnu_find_memory_regions function, but you also didn't > say that it works. Since that part of the code works independent of the > new note formats, I would like to get it folded into gdb asap. I hadn't had time to really test it. I just ran 'generate-core-file' from GDB today though and did manage to create a core using your code, so the 'find_memory_regions' seems to work ok. In order to get it to generate a core file, though, you need to fill in a notes section by giving GDB a notes section hook: gnu_ops.to_make_corefile_notes = gnu_to_make_corefile_notes; I dummied up one for now and thought I would wait for your thinking on notes formats to solidify before adding "real" code there, but whatever note format is used in 'crash' should also go here. > The i386-specific code will go into i386gnu-nat.c, not gnu-nat.c (but don't > worry about that right now). D'oh. Let me know if there are any other ways in which I can help on the project. Jonathan S. Arney Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
