> It's a lot easier on everything, I think. I think you are wrong.
> The client can just open the file, and then hand the handle over to > the server. Which means that if the client wants to supply data from someplace else, it has to become a filesystem. > The server can just read it exactly as it reads the file itself on > startup in the passive translator case. There are so many ways for this to fail and wedge and so on. This might be acceptable at startup with owner-supplied files, but not with ports supplied by users. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
