On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 02:09:43AM +0100, Neal H Walfield wrote: > > Did you try this with gnumach, OSKit-Mach or both? > > > > In your mail you talk about i386/i386at/com.c, which isn't in my > > OSKit-Mach tree. I suggest you try out OSKit-Mach because remote > > debugging works AFAIK (I haven't tried yet) and that uses the serial > > port. > > Been there, done that and it was even more fun than your plain old > vanilla GNU Mach. In fact, about an order of magnitude more fun. To > put it briefly, it does not work; what happens is: the comX device > ceases to exist after using it the first time (not that even works the > first time). Good stuff, huh?
Hmm strange as remote debugging works fine. Can you tell me more about it and especially how to reproduce this? Jeroen Dekkers P.S. If you wait a little bit longer than 48 seconds on IRC I might react. I'm not sitting there the whole day waiting until you are coming. :) -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg02544/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature