Hi Roland!

On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Roland McGrath wrote:

> It seems likely that this crash is due to improper reentrance.  I am
> suspicious of your other patch, because the situation it disables the check
> for is just the kind of situation I would suspect in this kind of lossage.

Hmm, but the kernel would still crash on this test, because the
assertion is not true. Of course a prober patch would be for 
oskit and not for oskit-mach. So I will write a patch for oskit and then
I'll see what happends.

wagi

-- 
Daniel Wagner                              "use quit to exit"
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

GnuPG: 1024D/DCDE890A (public key available on any keyserver)

_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Reply via email to