Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think the st_nlink value on a directory matters much to any
> user.
Sorry, i should have been more precise in my first mail.
GNU find for example uses that value. The wrong (too small) st_nlink
value was the cause for find not searching in the subdirectories of a
shadowfs.
Now i made the st_nlink of a directory in shadowfs be the sum of the
st_nlink values of the underlying directories; find works. But in the
case that there are directory entries with duplicate names in the
underlying directories, this value is to high. So, that is acceptable?
moritz
--
Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.chaosdorf.de/moritz/
"In short: just say NO TO DRUGS, and maybe you won't end up like
the Hurd people." - Linus Torvalds.
GPG fingerprint = 3A14 3923 15BE FD57 FC06 B501 0841 2D7B 6F98 4199
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
