> In German you would say that I have tomatoes on my eyes. ;) You mean egg on your face? :-)
> Mmh. What about i386_io_perm_modify vs. task_terminate on SMP? I don't > want to scribble in deallocated pages. Hmm, yes. I think you want to task_lock while diddling it and check TASK->active (like task_terminate itself does). > Also, what about i386_io_perm_modify vs another cpu switching to another > thread in the same task? The bad kinds of interactions I am worried > about is not so much the io_perm interface with itself, but with > task_terminate on the one hand and the scheduler on the other hand. Do I > use a simple lock in the machine_task and make them all use it? Yeah, that is probably what you need to do. Needs some more though. Stick in an XXX comment or a #warning #if NCPUS>1 and we can think about it again when working on making SMP really work. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
