On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 03:04:22PM -0400, Robert J. Chassell said:
> The new version formats fine for @smallbook, except for the included
> `oskit.patch', one line of which is overly long, but not by much.
I've formatted it for @smallbook.
> For this kind of problem, I would simply insert an @finalout near the
> beginning of the Texinfo file so TeX does not produce a dreadful black
> box to mark the spot. Also, I would include a note near the beginning
> to explain the problem. When you change the patch, the problem will
> go away.
I've done this.
> Also, you might want to remove the @page command right after this
> sentence:
>
> OSKit-Mach also needs a couple
>
>patches@footnote{@url{http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-hurd/2001-July/004654.html}}
> for it to work optimally (again, your line numbers will not
> match):
>
> since the @page command forces a page break between segments of text
> that should be on the same page.
I see. I tried the @page, as I didn't know about @group. I've now
converted it to use @group.
> All in all, the document looks good. (I have not read it, so I don't
> know about its content, but that is another matter. You can focus on
> that.)
Thank you again for your help. The newest version is at
<URL:http://www.etherhogz.org/doc/oskit-mach.texi> (I figured it would
be nice to stop sending the whole thing with my every revision), and the
individual patches are under <URL:http://www.etherhogz.org/src/patches/>.
It also contains several other revisions besides those listed above.
Thanks,
Kevin
--
Kevin Kreamer
FsckIT on openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
