Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We agreed, in an inspiring coordinated coding effort, on the following
> implementation (thanks to Johannes, Neal, Moshe and Rene):
No, that still has a race condition as follows. We begin in the fully
unlocked state.
THREAD 1 THREAD 2
Start recursive_lock
Read RL->locking_thread
Context Switch
Start recursive_lock, function finishes
Context Switch
Check RL->locking_thread
it seems to match, and the lock
incorrectly succeeds.
You need some kind of guard around this structure!
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
- a recursive lock prototype moshez
- Re: a recursive lock prototype Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: a recursive lock prototype Niels M�ller
- Re: a recursive lock prototype Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: a recursive lock prototype Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: a recursive lock prototype Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: a recursive lock prototype Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: a recursive lock prototype Igor Khavkine
- Re: a recursive lock prototype Roland McGrath
- Re: a recursive lock prototype Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: a recursive lock prototype Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: a recursive lock prototype Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: a recursive lock prototype Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: a recursive lock prototype Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: a recursive lock prototype Thomas Bushnell, BSG
