On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:24:47PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > This is how exec gets run. Try /lib/ld.so.1 /hurd/exec --help.
> >
> > I believe I did this and it worked, but I will try again.
>
> If this works, then I really start to wonder. If you can run all those old
> hurd binaries (e.g. just testing with --help) using the new libc, then the
> problem must be quite obscure.
Ah, no. See my other mail for more info, but that's where it is failing.
I will recompile the Hurd with the new glibc to see if that is where the
problem lies. There is certainly an issue with Debian following development
branches in its unstable distribution (although noticing problems early
isn't bad either).
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 05:17:08PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> I can't reproduce Marcus' problems with a freshly checked out glibc.
> Everything appears to work fine for me.
Maybe it is a build chain problem.
I use
binutils 2.11.90.0.7-2
gcc 1:2.95.4-0.010506
> Oh, and invoking ld.so on a statically linked executable isn't
> supposed to work I think. Produces a segmentation fault on Linux and
> Solaris, so I think the current Hurd hebaviour is quite acceptable.
ok.
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
