> That has always been my plan. I just went for getting tmpfs working as > fully as possible with semantics as close as possible to right and testing > it, before considering touching the default pager code. My current hacking is with the default pager and understanding Mach internals. What are you doing that I should be aware of?
- Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: now working Niels Möller
- Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: now working Neal H Walfield
- Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: now working Neal H Walfield
- Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: now working Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: now working Neal H Walfield
- Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: now working Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: now working Roland McGrath
- Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: now working Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: now working Roland McGrath
- Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: now working Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Neal H Walfield