On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 09:30:05AM -0600, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
> >>>>> Steve Bowman writes:
>
> SB> Hmmm. I checked a few with ldd and they are looking for
> SB> libc.so.6 which doesn't look good. These libs come with the
> SB> gcc-i386-gnu package. I have version 1.7-4 of this package
> SB> installed - and it looks broken.
Thanks for reminding me. I would have replied sooner but was having
telco problems.
>
> 1.7-3 only installs a symlink from /usr/i386-gnu/lib -> /gnu/lib.
>
> Now, if you're getting libc.so.6-linked libraries in that directory,
> something's really wrong. Maybe double-check that /usr/i386-gnu/lib
> is indeed a symlink to the directory that contains your Hurd-compiled
> libraries.
>
> If not, and you didn't tweak it yourself, we should file a bug report
> against gcc-i386-gnu.
No bug report needed. /usr/i386-gnu/lib is indeed a symlink to /gnu/lib
and ldd under hurd shows:
libc.so.0.2 => /lib/libc.so.0.2 (0x01022000)
for all libraries. ldd under linux just finds the wrong libc so that's
the wrong way to check.
Steve
--
Steve Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (preferred)
Buckeye, AZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.goodnet.com/~sbowman/>
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd <http://www.debian.org>
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
