> So we probably have to give in. The apt author (Jason Gunthorpe) is not
> happy about a special configure check for that on the Hurd (quote: "I really
> hate adding more configure tests"), and the code is correct in any way.[1]
I have no problem with that. We should not claim to conform to things we
don'te rally conform to.
> Do we do report the correct things with sysconf (resp fsync et al)?
sysconf just returns what the macro definitions are.
We should and do define _POSIX_FSYNC.
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
