Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it okay to check in the below workaround until you got around to do it > proper? The current code is certainly bogus and is the cause of a > reproducible bug. The below patch just restores the situation as it was > before the breakage. I just checked in a proper fix.
- patch to fix io-seek on readonly stores Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: patch to fix io-seek on readonly stores Olivier Galibert
- Re: patch to fix io-seek on readonly stores Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: patch to fix io-seek on readonly stores Roland McGrath
- Re: patch to fix io-seek on readonly stores Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: patch to fix io-seek on readonly stores Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: patch to fix io-seek on readonly stores Jeff Bailey
- Thomas Bushnell, BSG