Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > why is the code that allows for user EXECSERVERS commented out?
>
> You got me. It might just have been buggy, or there might have been a
> security concern that we weren't ready to think about hard enough. There
> might be some old mailing list archives with relevant discussion, but it's
> a long time ago now.
There should be no security concerns, though make sure if you turn it
one that it doesn't take effect if EXEC_DEFAULTS or EXEC_SECURE is
set. IIRC it was commented out because of some bug in scanning the
environment.
