Re: e2fsck

[Thomas Bushnell, BSG]

Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I'm not sure why you think this is useful for the Hurd.  Our ext2fs has no
> choice but to ignore the filetype field anyway, because an active
> translator setting might make it incorrect.  Moreover, I don't see how you
> think this change would be correct.

I have a scheme in the long run for making it work for one-link nodes.
The reason not to ignore problem is that ext2fs spews a million error
messages for each node as it "fixes" the type field.