Maxim Cournoyer <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Tomas, > > Tomas Volf <[email protected]> writes: > > [...] > >> ;;; Copyright © 2015, 2016 Mathieu Lirzin <[email protected]> >> ;;; Copyright © 2021 Maxim Cournoyer <[email protected]> >> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ cases based on their names." >> (skip (or (positive? (test-runner-skip-count runner)) >> (positive? (test-runner-xfail-count runner))))) >> ;; XXX: The global results need some refinements for XPASS. >> - (format trs-port ":global-test-result: ~A~%" >> + (format trs-port ":test-global-result: ~A~%" >> (if fail "FAIL" (if skip "SKIP" "PASS"))) >> (format trs-port ":recheck: ~A~%" >> (if fail "yes" "no")) > > I'm not sure; while the .texi does mention :test-global-result:, > grepping the automake source reveals quite some use of > :global-test-result:. An issue should be logged upstream and the choice > of which one to use settled there, I think :-)
This is a nice catch. I think you are probably right, but to be sure I sent an email to the automake list and will hope for definitive answer. Tomas -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
